TopHeader CurrentMatters

Case Study - Valuation of Project Equity

Background

  • Engaged by a University to investigate the quantum of its project equity in intellectual property as a result of its participation in research projects undertaken at the University
  • Funds contributed and resources allocated (such as equipment and personnel research time) count towards project equity
  • Due to the number of parties involved and the methodology adopted to calculate project equity, a dispute arose between some of the parties as to each party’s stake in project equity and therefore its stake in intellectual property
  • As a result of the dispute as to each party’s equity stake there was a further dispute as to the quantum of royalties paid

Ferrier Hodgson Involvement

  • Reconciled funds contributed from each party and the resources allocated
  • Interviewed personnel including management of companies
  • Developed more reasonable methodology to calculate project equity however, with only limited records maintained, this was difficult
  • Were able to determine mis-allocation of funds to other parties that had the effect of falsely increasing their project equity
  • Pragmatic in our approach by providing scenario and sensitivity analysis to present a range of different outcomes of the University’s stake in project equity
  • After reconciling the allocation of funds between the parties the University’s stake in project equity was increased

Outcome

  • Matter settled by mediation
  • Able to produce fair and reasonable calculation of each participant’s project equity
  • Consequently, the University’s stake in project equity was increased and therefore able to receive higher royalties
 
Phone:
+61 7 3831 4833
Fax:
+61 7 3831 3862
Email:
robert.malt@fh.com.au