The pubs in South Australia have been generally resilient over many generations but they are now under more pressure than ever before. Whilst operators continue to face challenges including rising power costs, penalty rates, high payroll tax, lower discretionary spending, stagnant population, red tape and new competition (small bars, craft breweries and gastronomical experiences), it is the gaming that is now under the spotlight.
The introduction of pokies in South Australia was the saviour to the struggling industry back in 1994 and was the catalyst for a turnaround and refurbishment of many of the State’s hotels and clubs. Now the sector is once again at the cross roads as the pokies “rivers of gold” are under threat from changing consumer gambling preferences (eg internet gaming) and a growing anti-gaming political sentiment. This has left many local operators sweating on the outcome of the State Election.
Statewide total gaming revenue has been steadily decreasing from its peak of $793 million in FY07 (pre-smoking laws) to $680 million in FY17. This decline is also reflected by the shrinking value for the GME’s. The latest trading round for GME’s reveal that vendors received only $13,708 per GME compared to the vendor price of $54,473 in 2012. The graphs below reflect the decline in both gaming revenue and GME sale price over the past five years.
A recent Ferrier Hodgson survey revealed most hotel operators would prefer an open market system as opposed to the current GME trading scheme. We at Ferrier Hodgson believe that in the current environment, demand for gaming assets will continue to remain subdued regardless of the GME trading platform. This demand pressure obviously also affects the overall value of venues which is concerning for both operators and financiers. We note that subject to legislative change, potential demand for GME’s may come from the SkyCity Casino in FY19 as it has 430 GME’s less than its current licence capacity and is shortly about to embark on its $330 million upgrade that has unanimous political support.
There was an immediate impact following the reduction of the maximum bet from $10 to $5 on 1 January 2017 (refer graph below) as particularly evidenced in the first two months of 2017 in which gaming was approximately 6% lower across the State from the corresponding months in 2016.
The policy announcement by SA Best party leader Nick Xenophon on 19 February 2018 included further reducing maximum bets from $5 to $1 (to all gaming venues) by 1 July 2019 and to remove 4,000 (approx. 36%) gaming machines from the State’s gaming hotels (but not community hotels or clubs) over the next 5 years. Should SA Best have influence to implement some or all of their policies following the election then this will have a significant impact on the future performance of all gaming venues and for some, its sustainability for the future.
The gaming harm minimisation agenda amongst some political groups is gathering momentum with the SA Greens recently announcing a hard line position being a total pokie ban in South Australia within 5 years (excluding the Casino), which is in line with the Tasmanian Government’s recent policy announcement.
In simple terms, capping the maximum bet to $1 per spin means punters take longer to lose and therefore lower revenues to the operators (and of course lower tax revenues for the State Government). A Productivity Commission report revealed that a $10 maximum bet may cause a gambler to lose up to $1,200 per hour on the pokies but the proposed $1 cap would reduce losses to a maximum of $120 per hour.
In the current publication of the AHA|SA magazine, the AHA|SA suggested the potential impact of a $1 maximum bet may reduce a venue’s EBIT by at least 43% (and possibly up to 69%). In the table below, we applied the AHA|SA estimates against hypothetical gaming venues (both a going concern and a leasehold) to show what consequences a $1 maximum bet could have for the venue’s cash flows (particularly those with existing high debt) and their values.
The impact on gaming hotels will be even more detrimental should the number of gaming machines be reduced along with a $1 cap.
Our hospitality team has worked in partnership with financiers and operators in the industry for more than 25 years. We are the market leader in this field having reviewed more than 200 venues and managed over 100 venues nationally in the past 5 years alone. We provide an unrivalled level of industry experience and intelligence, operational knowledge and industry contacts to deliver our clients commercial and cost-effective solutions.
Share this article →
We deliver information relevant to you and your industry